The Salt Lake Tribune
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Chaffetz lovefest ends
The Washington (D.C.) City Paper reams Utah Rep. Jason Chaffetz for masquerading as a constitutional authority.

Chaffetz opposes a deal to give Utah a fourth congressional seat, if the compromise also gives the District of Columbia representation. The former multi-level marketeer says that would be "just simply unconstitutional."

City Paper's Loose Lips blog fires back:

Here’s the beautiful thing about the United States of America: We have an entire branch of government devoted to sorting out these questions. And it’s not Congress.

Nope—Congress’ job isn’t to sort out matters of constitutionality. That’s for the federal judiciary to decide. Congress’ job is to conduct oversight of the federal government and to pass legislation in keeping with its principles and policy objectives.

. . . Chaffetz shouldn’t hide behind the trope that such a move wouldn’t be constitutional.

That’s not what you’re here to decide, congressman—you need to decide whether D.C. deserves to be afforded a vote, with Utah gaining one in the process. If you think that leaving the federal district disenfranchised is a worthy policy goal, say so. But leave the questions of constitutionality to the courts.

Unless, of course, it's a question of leg-wrestling rules — then go for it, Jason.

3 Comments:

At February 3, 2009 11:09 AM , Anonymous NotJason said...

Blogs aren't worth the electrons they use, including the SL Crawler.

 
At February 3, 2009 11:32 AM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hmmmm. Problem with this logic: Every elected leader is sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Not just the Supreme Court.

See? http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/Oath_Office.htm

The Constitution contains an oath of office only for the president. For other officials, including members of Congress, that document specifies only that they "shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this constitution." Hmmm. So, just maybe, members of Congress should consider constitutionality before proposing a program. Tards.

 
At February 3, 2009 1:21 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm shocked..SHOCKED that "Arc" the King Butt-Kisser hasn't yet posted on this.

S'matter, Arc-ie? "Google Alert" on your boyfriend having technical difficulties?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Feedback
   If you've got something to say, type away -- I'm wide open to rants and raves. There is no registration required.
   If you want to send me a tip (the reporter in me dies hard) or photos of goofy or horrible stuff, email gwarchol@sltrib.com.