The Salt Lake Tribune
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Too many men on the field

I laughed pretty hard when I first read this article about the Utah State University athletic department reviewing its policy on bloggers and whether to grant them press passes.

Given the football team has won six games in three-plus seasons, you would think the Aggies would be begging for any attention.

You want to discuss us in front of an audience? That's great! Sure we'll let you! Can you play quarterback, too?


In my second reaction to the article, I wondered whether denying bloggers passes also amounted to restricting public access. Utah State receives tax dollars, after all.

Apparently, this issue has already been decided.

Games and access to them are considered intellectual property and universities and professional leagues have been given the right to control them, said Scott Reinardy, an assistant professor of journalism at the University of Kansas. In an e-mail, Reinardy explained:


As their product, they allow people to purchase tickets, broadcast on radio/TV/Internet, and allow journalists to write about it. It becomes a balance of controlling access and protecting their property. If every Tom, Dick and Harry were allowed to take photos/video, and then distribute it (particularly for profit), wouldn't that diminish the product? Is it any different than people who pirate movies by filming them at the local multiplex and then sell the videos?


Update: After reading this post, Reinardy e-mailed me to clarify he was not advocating for the access policy. He was just explaining the position of the athletic departments and leagues.

— NC

Labels:

Thursday, June 12, 2008
RSL critics MIA in Sandy

Given all the public vitriol that seems to greet every new bit of news about Real Salt Lake's relationship with Sandy city, I was greatly surprised by something I read in the Deseret News this morning:

"The Sandy City Council, acting both on its own behalf and as a redevelopment agency, signed off on the remaining $10 million in the $45 million public funding package (for Real's new stadium). The meeting was a public hearing, but no residents showed up to comment."

The council's online agenda, which appears to have been posted in accordance with Utah's Open and Public Meetings Act, does show that the council was scheduled to recess in order to convene into a Redevelopment Agency meeting. I had trouble finding a similar agenda for the RDA portion of the meeting, but Sandy spokesman Nick Duerkson told me that the notification was properly made and posted in accordance with the law.

Either way, it wasn't exactly a secret that this was coming up. You'd think that the staunchest critics would be on the ball.

For his part, Duerkson said he wasn't surprised. He said Sandy meets with RSL in a bi-monthly planning meeting -- and usually only a few members of the public bother to show up.

I suppose it's far easier to attack RSL and Sandy on the Internet comment boards and letters pages of the state's daily newspapers than it is to actually show up and try to make a difference. And yes, I'm sure an argument could be made that the council would have signed off on the final piece of this funding package no matter who showed up to complain at the meeting.

But when the public abandons its duty to participate in the process, it allows those in power to say -- and correctly so -- "we didn't hear any complaints."

-- mdl

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Quarterbacks and Drugs: Replay Down
A few weeks ago I wondered aloud whether former LSU quarterback Ryan Perrilloux failed a drug test and, if so, what the circumstances were. So, I did what this blog is all about: I sent a records request.

Louisiana State University responded to my request last week. The records show five LSU athletes tested positive for banned substances since from Jan. 1 to May 7.

Six other athletes had "Probationary Positives," according to LSU. That means screenings found a negligible amount of drugs in their system or the athletes did something in violation of the drug policy, such as having a medication without a prescription.

LSU declined to identify the offenders, specify what substances were found or what sports the athletes played. It should be noted 339 other tests during that time were negative. The cited documents are below. Here's a link to LSU's drug testing data from previous years.

Perrilloux gave an interview recently discussing the drug whispers, sort of.

-- nc

Labels:

Feedback
   The Tribune welcomes comments, thoughts, ideas, arguments, etc. Just keep it on topic and respectful, and have fun!